Opa134 vs opa2134 vs opa21. The final choice of ICs depends on application and personal preferences. A Sep 7, 2024 · G'day all, an interesting thread. OPA134 . Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2134, OPA2604. if cars are driving past you in 2m distance, you won't hear that piano player in 3m distance. But deep bass and transients seem more punchy in the OPA2134. TI Has the RC4580 as a NJM4560 replacement as well. It may or may not sound at all noticeably better than a TL072, it depends on the circuit and application. Another way to say it: JFET OPamps like OPA2134 can replace most any other audio opamp Apr 11, 2024 · Conclusion of OPA2134 VS NE5532 In conclusion, the comparison between OPA2134 and NE5532 reveals two protean functional amplifiers suitable for a wide range of audio operations. Hi Community, TI!!! I would like to upgrade an audio amplifier OPA2134 and the TI site web recommands me to change for a new OPA. OPA2604 is a little bit faster. Thread starter theque; Start date Nov 21, 2012; Tags headphone-amplifiers Sep 30, 2010 · Looking at the TI web site, the current chips (OPA134, 2134, and 4134) all now have the TI logo on them in white and have the notch in the end by pin 1 but do not appear to have the dot by pin 1. It is difficult to say which one is better. Since i couldnt find an opa2134, i just use tl072 and the likes for our projects I am just curious how opa2134's output performance. Thread starter Tieftoener; Start date 2002-12-18 4:47 am; Status This old topic is closed. I am curious to see if this impression changes over the week. Equipment Forums. Print. I replaced my ad8610 I/Vs with ad 825s last night. Apr 30, 2007 · Okay so I've been comparing the micro stack, ultra micro stack and the basic desktop amps. You play it: "Hey, it's me. OPA2134 Hoja de datos de piezas en PDF, Texas Instruments Amplifiers, Distribuidor, stock y mejor precio. I've replaced the old TL082 in my active crossover with opa2134. The OPA134 series are ultra-low • Crossover Jan 11, 2016 · Yes sir. Feb 10, 2012 · The 5532/5534 is an excellent sounding and very durable work horse; the OPA134 series can be adequate too. Stimulated by a recent thread about opamps, I went back and compared again BB OPA2134 and OPA2604 in my Lehman Black Cube phono amp. I know there are a lot of factors that set these apart, but I'm writing to ask what difference the amp modules make. Apr 1, 2012 · Howdy. In other words, OPAx132PA and OPAx132UA (standard grades) are equivalent to OPAx134, which does NOT have a high grade. nognow. AD825: On first listen, just like what I experienced when I replaced the opa134 with the ad825 on a DAC more than a year ago, I had smile on my face. Hope this helps. OPA2134 vs. Download OPA2134 Datasheet There's been quite a bit of discussion of the comparative merits of the OPA2134 vs the OPA2604 recently. I plan to get the brown dog adapters and try the opa 627's soon. Ken ••• Apr 19, 2024 · The OPA134 series consists of ultra-low distortion, low-noise operational amplifiers that are fully specified for audio applications. I'm looking into the idea of replacing them with a SIP adaptor and something like the OPA134/2134 or another newer opamp. I no nothing about this. Although many people dismiss the NE5532 as an obsolete component and try to locate a replacement, the NE5532 is still adequate for most applications. OPA2604 is one of the few op-amps having +24 -24 max supply voltage. I use a EMG amplifier circuit. AD826 used instead of the the OPA2134. I want to use NE5532 instead. I just thought using two opa627, i will achieve 2134's audio quality. OPA2134 is more stable, as it is not too fast for Audio. The ad825 seems to be more detailed alright. --lme49722 lme4562 lm4562 opamp is very good sound ,higher ratings than opa2134 -but not as Jul 29, 2002 · Haha, in fact, it makes you wonder if a "better" opamp will yield just as much (or more) improvements over Burson. If anything, it has a more 'neutral' sound than the (possibly slightly euphonic) OPA2134, but its performance is very reliable and dependable and of a very high standard, which possibly explains its long standing use in 'professional' audio gear. A true FET input stage is incorporated to provide excellent sound quality and speed for exceptional audio performance. And I agree with you, the real OPA134 series are very good op-amps. A. Dec 6, 2018 · I would recommend OPA2134 or OPA134 and if you have money the OPA627 or OPA637. 4. Forums. The 2132 has better specs and is felt by most who have heard them compared to sound slightly better. I would say it depends on what circuit. Feb 28, 2017 · OPA2134 is a FET opamp and has its own unique benefits but isn't as low noise as R4580. The opa2132 provides high precision, making it ideal for demanding applications. Jan 8, 2017 · Below are THD+N vs. In fact, dual OPA627 on Browndogs would have been something to consider as well. As for BB OPA2134 sound, it sounds better to me than the R4580 and is less fatiguing. Feb 11, 2021 · I last tried the circuit with OPA2134 in year 2000, and with TL074 in 1992. 1 the bass channel is on the opa2134 opamp not the LM4562 Mar 31, 2008 · I feel the OPA2134 has the highest 2nd order harmonic distortions that I can not live with. com SBOS058A –DECEMBER 1997–REVISED OCTOBER 2015 5 Pin Configuration and Functions OPA134: P and D Packages 8-Pin PDIP and 8-Pin SOIC OPA2134: P and D Packages Top View 8-Pin PDIP and 8-Pin SOIC Top View OPA4134: P and D Packages 14-Pin PDIP and 14-Pin SOIC Top View Pin Functions: OPA134 PIN I/O DESCRIPTION Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2134, , OPA1678. Jun 17, 2007 · AD823 has a bit more limited soundstage, and the highs are not as prominent as in the ad8066. Left channel is 5-10 dB better but there is also more variance between boards/opamps. The high level of distortion of the OPA2134 is good but it consumes more power than normal (8 to 10 mA per IC) and it is not rail to rail output. amplitude for all opamps (with 560 ohm shunt resistors). Using hd600s and 400is to test them Ive compared the Jul 22, 2022 · OPA2134 is great for buffer and clean applications but I never liked it for overdrive/distortion. . Nov 23, 2007 · reason i changed to opa2134 @ front on prelude i wanted all channels have the same sounding vs xmeridian yeh but since LM4562 is the only swappable opamp @ front, @ 7. Download OPA2134 Datasheet Oct 23, 2005 · anything better than opa2134 Hi, Interesting that no one has mentined opa2132P so far. I have a 1988 carver stereo per-amplifier. Also with some Keller Williams live recordings (Live at the Vic Theatre, Chigaco, 2002), the sound seemed to be quite far away, as if you were listening to small speaker box 2m in front of you. Jan 7, 2021 · So considering NE5532, LM4562 and OPA2134, OPA2134 gives best measured results in AIYIMA A07. And without mentioning every op amp in existence, I'll close with I yet have to find a circuit where an NE5532 is the best possible option. ti. The third choice would be 2277 but i believe 2134/2132 would be better? I'll be running the Cmoy at 18v, the gain at the moment is about 2 but i might try to increase it as i've added a pot now. The sound quality comes from the entire circuit, not the op amp. OPA1612 sounds better than any transistor preamp I've ever heard and better then my own 6N6P 2 case -no barrels hold- 36kg monster preamp with a 100% double blind test win rate. The sound is much better but there's still something a bit "hi-fi" and "grey" in the presentation. Apr 7, 2007 · It seems to miss a certain slam I had with the opa2132, might be because of the lower output current it can supply, 16 vs 40mA. Easiest is to replace LF351N and LF353N for the OPA134 and OPA2134 just like the shop in Idaho did. Nov 30, 2021 · Part Number: OPA2134 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1656 , OPA134 Hi Team, My customer wants to replace OPA1656 with OPA2134. Oct 5, 2005 · I was wondering how big difference there is between 2132 and 2134 as the first one is almost twice the price of 2134. Although I am a fan of the OPA2134, I still have very considerable respect for the NE5532. But now I have to replace them. Aug 24, 2012 · i tryed lme49722 opa2134 and opa1612 ,--. 5mV vs 2mV, respectively). 2. According to the datasheets for both Jun 16, 2015 · The two Op-amps mentioned in the video are the Burr Brown dual op-amp OPA2134PA in the cream painted build and the jrc4558 in the silver build. Mar 11, 2003 · 1. May 25, 2018 · Part Number: INA129 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2134, , INA128, TL072, TINA-TI Hello. Go Down Pages 1. It appears that the OPA1611/2 have a lower noise voltage, wider bandwidth and higher slew rate than the OPA134 and OPA2134's. But $40-57 each Careful swapping in a higher bandwidth part, they can oscillate in "old" circuit designs and not all parts are unity-gain stable. Download OPA2134 Datasheet The main difference between OPAx132 and OPAx134 is in DC precision of the high grade of OPAx2132P/U and OPA2134 (e. Double-blind AB we also preferred the OPA2134 at the listening position, especially with the EQ in heavy use. OPA2134 gain stage with voltage series feedback. Posted by KanedaK (A) on December 22, 2016 at 16:38:35 . It needs an adapter though. It is a really nice-sounding chip in the right place, but man it is expensive and you can get nearly there for a lot less in trouble as well %PDF-1. In the circuit i use INA128 as In-Amp and TL072 as Op-Amp. Apr 19, 2024 · The OPA134 series consists of ultra-low distortion, low-noise operational amplifiers that are fully specified for audio applications. Jun 3, 2013 · This probably isn’t the answer you want, but I’m going to present it to you anyway. It is a touch better than opa2134 - especially where small reduction in noise level is welcomed. Can anyone suggest drop-in replacements to OPA2134? I'm looking for a natural, transparent sound vs colored. Jun 7, 2021 · About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright Nov 25, 2015 · Since you brought it up, please answer this: imagine you run out for supplies. Jun 6, 2012 · 7 mA quiescent current is typical of the OPA627, for the OPA2132 it should be typ. 4 %âãÏÓ 2 0 obj >stream xœÅZÍrãÆ N娧à%UëÊ Æ3øÙª ¸’ÖVÙ+É ½ù©½`IP‚—$(”,¿G\å È=9äYò:é tÏ @ ÙU‰]®õ‚3=Ó_ÿ}ÝÀýQÈ’I ^:Iü ½`RåG¾—ðØ &ý?«Û£åQ˜¾t _ºãþÈŸÜ _ ÝOØć ÙDðI zÉd¾ž|ù—%›œ–“;‚Ç‚{áDø|¡D« íe¥z~ G º_û{2þ³üM«f-Hc/~nÉè ~V‚Â÷° !ž¿ƒÔ#ð=æ¶ ˆ~pÁ0P- £ ÒQ May 14, 2007 · The 2134 is an "audio" op-amp, meaning that it is a de-rated 2132. for a portable cmoy, I'm tending to recommend the AD823. It was recently re-capped and all new guts put in . so far I note that the ad8610 seemed to go deeper in the bass and is a little warmer overall than the ad825. May 30, 2007 · If the orginal OP is a FET (like TL072, OPA2134 etc) we may be careful sometimes NOT possible to replace with Bipolar (like NE5532 etc). The R4580 is probably better spec wise but sometimes distortion of a signal to make it warmer (quieter treble) is a good thing. Mar 19, 2005 · I tested the opa2134 vs the ad712 that were stock. g. 4 mA, max. Jul 26, 2019 · Although rare it is sadly a fact of life that fake parts are a reality in the electronics industry. Jan 30, 2002 · OPA2134 vs OPA2604 vs OPA637. Have you found Oct 8, 2017 · So I just blew up 5 Burr Brown OPA2134 due to bad labelling on the PCB (Ok I was also supposed to be more careful). max Vos of 0. May 5, 2002 · ad825 vs ad8610 Hi Fmak, thanks for all the ongoing help. On the other hand, the opa2134 offers superior audio performance, making it perfect for audio applications. +Gain Bandwidth. While the opa2132 and opa2134 share similarities, they also have unique characteristics. While the OPA2134 offers superior performance in terms of lower noise,deformation, and potentially advanced bandwidth, it comes with an advanced price label. But that does not say anything about the SQ. 3. Now all the folks are using opa2134 op -amps as the replacement. 6SL7 tube SRPP gain stage with voltage shunt feedback. Feb 11, 2021 · According to the TI datasheets OPA1612 has less noise than OPA1656. OPA134. Part Number: OPA2134 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1678, OPA1611, OPA1602, OPA1642. Hi there probaly a simple question maybe not. Nov 8, 2006 · OPA2134 and OPA2604 are very close in data. TL072 works most of the time but I almost always find a better substitute in dirt pedals. It sounds swell but I have a set of the higher performance LMA49720NA DIP-8 opamps here on my desk and I'm wondering if they're plug-in compatible. OPA2132. When you return, you see a phone message. Does anybody know how much is NE5532 THD. Jan 7, 2002 · Thanks for the reply though, I checked it out and noticed the comment on the OPA2604 needing more juice, so I checked out the spec sheet at TI, and it seems like it'll like anything from +/-15V to +/-24V, while the OPA2134 only likes up to +/-18V (pretty close to the -17V of my power suply), so I think I'll feel safer going with the OPA2604 regardless. Dec 22, 2016 · OPA2134 vs OPA2604 vs OPA2107. I don't like OPA2134 much, so something like AD8620 would have been another good comparison to Burson. Previous topic - Next topic. Double blind AB, the TL074 circuit had audible hiss from the speaker, and the 2134 circuit did not. Anything other than these values and they're either fake or damaged (or both). Dec 3, 2018 · Either one is overkill, but the difference could be in the speed of the opamp, they could be oscillating at very high frequencies, and/or operate outside of spec limits (the OPA2134 is unity gain stable, not sure if the OPA2604 is, and I am not sure what gain they are used in this circuit). (Opa2134 is not broken in at all, so it will most likely get better w/time) The base is much better from the 2134, but it does not seem to be as powerful on the output side, but could just be the break-in needed. Download OPA2134 Datasheet Oct 31, 2012 · MUSES 8920 vs Burr-Brown OPA2134 Home. How are LME49860, LME49720 etc? Are they drop-in Feb 16, 2007 · HiI am building a 3-way active cross over circuit. Jan 10, 2016 · He talked to me about OPA1611's versus OPA134's as well as the OPA1612's versus OPA2134's. Same with the OPA627 though. The AD826 seems to be smoother than the OPA in the voice range. I am sure that the overall results are going to be context specific, but thought an additional comparison might prove useful. OPA2134: OPA2134 VS OPA1656 Nov 25, 2015 · Im interested in op amp rolling for my amp since its not expensive to try out and I was surprised to find a lot of variation between them, the amp has a very simple circuit so my results could be more siginificant than with other amps. Is OP Amp swapping the key to better sound quality or a complete waste of time?Op Amps: https://fosiaudioshop. OPA2134 costs an arm and a leg. com/products/op-amp-chip-muses02-opa2604ap-opa2 Dec 17, 2014 · OPA2604 vs OPA2134 ? OPA2604 vs OPA2134 ? Started by nognow, December 17, 2014, 02:03:48 PM. The OPA134, OPA2134, and OPA4134 (OPAx134) series are ultra-low distortion, low-noise operational amplifiers fully specified for audio applications. Switching op amps is likely to cause as Feb 1, 2006 · OPA2134 is a far easier drop-in replacement for the TL072. If you want to reopen this topic Apr 19, 2024 · The OPA134 series consists of ultra-low distortion, low-noise operational amplifiers that are fully specified for audio applications. Noise level is basically the same in LM4562 and NE5532, while OPA2134 is 2 dB weaker. But I couldn't find anything about NE5532 THD in Datasheet. Posted by Ehien (A) on January 30, 2002 at 11:22:50 . it also consumes less power. A question for opamp gurus. So I can use any one of these ( one at a time !). OPA1642 is its replacement despite the lower type number. We get lower current noise and better EMI resistence. THD+N level of all right channels is almost identical at -94 dBV. That was the circuit where the OPA2134 sounded better. I found that OPA1612 was in the ultimate soundplus collection that's why i have change for it. Conclusion of OPA2134 VS NE5532 In conclusion, the comparison between OPA2134 and NE5532 reveals two protean functional amplifiers suitable for a wide range of audio operations. the best sounding is OPA1612 ,not for driving headphones -low output current drive ,3ma current consumption ---then opa2134 the best all around as preamplifier it can be used at high gain 6-10 times,very good sounding and Musical,good for biassing in class A. Jan 10, 2006 · Hi All, I have a number of pieces of equipment (sony cd player, DMP3 and so on) that use M5218 and NJM4560 in SIP packages. The OPA1656 is the industry’s lowest voltage noise high voltage CMOS on the market. Part Number: OPA1656. Portable Headphone Amps. ThanX in adv Dec 18, 2002 · AD8620 vs. Opa2134 is a very good opamp. User actions. Price wise, the opa627 is much more expensive than the opa2134. An op amp is part of a larger circuit and is chosen because its specs match those required for the circuit. Even large reputable (and not cheap) suppliers like RS, Digikey, Mouser, Element 14 and the suchlike aren't completely immune to occasionally sourcing components from questionable distributors. AD8620 vs. 8 mA, for the OPA2134 typ. Mar 25, 2022 · Conclusion of OPA2134 VS NE5532 The OPA2134 is a Fet Input op-amp, while the NE5532 is a Bipolar Input op-amp. And it is a JFET opamp, which is always preferred by myself in the positions where slightly higher voltage noise of the opamp is negligible, like here. However, if you want the best possible stereo imaging and resolution with regard to phase critical stereo information, much lower distortion is in order. Goggle bill d mod carver c-1. I have a phono preamp board with three socketed DIP-8 OPA2134 in it. the design is based on opa2134 Dual OpAmp Which has a THD=0. When the original OP is Bipolar(like NE5532 etc) we can most always replace with FET or another similar Bipolar OP. OPA134, OPA2134, OPA4134 www. 00008% but in my area I can't find OPA2134. 5 mA. It offers exceptional performance in almost any audio application. lxfisq jgssxfx mnvj xktqgmk juvfg jijmw cmoibq kobgx abap rytemyc
